The Boston Globe‘s Adria Watson recently reported that Parents Defending Education has filed a civil rights complaint with the U.S. Department of Education against the Milton Public Schools. It sounds daunting. But PDE is not parents, it’s an obedient franchise of right-wing donors like Charles Koch.
PDE’s Milton complaint is based on an email exchange one anonymous individual had with a Milton official. (PDE always hides the true complainant). The individual fussed about a program called The Calculus Project which the Milton official characterized as aimed to “increase the number of African American/Black and LatinX students who enroll and succeed in high-level mathematics courses at Milton High School, culminating with the study of calculus in their senior year . . . There are many supports and programs for all students to achieve at high Levels.” The complainant responded that the program seems discriminatory against white students.
PDE then relied on excerpts from the project’s webpage. For instance, The Calculus Project “us[es] research-supported strategies to increase the representation and success of Black, Hispanic, Indigenous, People of Color and low-income students in advanced mathematics” and supports “cultural sensitivity and its commitment to sustainability” and the project “is part of a movement.” (It’s clear the movement is to improve math achievement.) The complaint can’t even keep the story straight in a single paragraph—in just two sentences it asserts that the program is entirely race based then quotes the Project’s website as seeking to aid “students of color and those who are economically disadvantaged.”
That’s a federal case to PDE—one grumbling anonymous individual and an unbalanced website reading. It’s consistent with other low-proof PDE complaints like one against a Washington state district based on the evidence of a right-wing radio talk show host’s commentary. Or an Ohio complaint where the Columbus Post-Dispatch reported that PDE “lists no one from Columbus involved as a participant.” The Portland (ME) Press-Herald reported of PDE’s complaint against that city that “The group’s complaint does not provide specific examples of any individual who is being excluded.”
PDE apparently never tried to contact Project Calculus founder Adrian Mims but Max Larkin of WBUR did. Mims stated that “any student between grades 8 and 12 can apply to participate.” WBUR reports that up to 20% of students participating in seven Massachusetts school districts are white.
So far as I can tell from reviewing all twenty-three OCR complaints PDE has filed with DOE, PDE has never contacted a district before filing a complaint and launching a press release. I’ve seen no instance in which PDE has identified a complainant.
If PDE had any sincere interest in education, it would contact the school district before heading to Washington. Instead, it sent out a press release. the Milton attack is poorly researched, anonymous, without the courtesy of reaching out to the district. A hit and run job.
No PDE representative would talk with the Globe. PDE ducks questions from real journalists who might ask awkward questions like “who is funding you?” But you can regularly find PDE’s Nicole Neily or Erika Sanzi on right wing media like Fox, which eagerly pass along PDE’s propaganda points. PDE not only hits and runs, it runs and hides.
True North Research has recently exposed PDE’s ties to the heart of right-wing billionaire efforts to destroy public education in Tax Docs Link Right-Wing “Parents Group” to Leonard Leo’s Dark Money Network. Leo is perhaps the right’s most successful channeler of dark money. Donald Trump granted him virtual carte blanche to pick conservative justices for the Supreme Court.
PDE president Nicole Neily, a veteran Koch political network operative, told the Columbus Post-Dispatch “We just all work from home. We’re all working moms.” But the operation collected over $3,100,000 in its first year of 2021, most of it untraceable. True North concluded “All this shows how PDE’s sudden arrival has been met with major funding from secret sources as it continues to portray itself in the media as merely ‘local moms’.”
Of the twenty-three civil rights complaints PDE has filed DOE is investigating only three and that doesn’t mean anything will come of them (a few are recent and are likely under review). But the advocacy director for AASA, the School Superintendents Association told Education Week investigations are “incredibly time-consuming and burdensome for districts”—even bad faith ones.
Then there is the foreseeable consequence of feeding these complaints to right-wing propaganda outlets like Breitbart, Daily Caller, and Fox. A PDE lawsuit filed against Wellesley (settled on terms favorable to the town) brought “obscene” and “awful” emails targeted at the school superintendent. A Breitbart story generated by PDE led to “racist and confrontational” messages to two Black principals in Newton.
DOE has just decided to investigate PDE’s complaint against Newton North High School. The group claims five affiliated parent groups in Massachusetts and fifty incidents in the state.
Generate news coverage (especially in right-wing media), disrupt education, and bring educators under attack. Those are PDE’s tactical goals. The end game is to crush teachers’ unions, decimate public education, and turn schools into a private profit-making industry.
Parents Defending Education is an agent of right-wing billionaires out to destroy public education. Don’t let them do it.
“One thing big money typically lacks is credibility, which is why those who deploy it work so hard to cover their tracks.”—Jacob Hacker and Paul Pierson
Full disclosure: as a (now retired) educator in the UMass system, I am a union member. I write about dark money, democracy, and oligarchy. My book, Dark Money and the Politics of School Privatization, is now in print. For more on phony parent groups like PDE, see my Masters of Deception: Parent Props and Their Funders].
They don’t take the steps that would involve finding out if real change was needed or pursuing that change, because that’s not the goal. Even if the complaint isn’t taken up by the reds, even if PDE loses, it doesn’t matter, because it’s all about fostering the narrative that public schools are terrible places that need to be dismantled and privatized. As Chris Rufo told the audience at Hillsdale, “To get universal school choice, you really need to operate from a place of universal school distrust.” All of this noise is about sowing distrust.
Thank you for following this story.
Exactly right.
Thanks, Mo. There is so much ‘dark money’ pouring into these groups that it’s hard for an ordinary person to keep track. (And I am an ‘ordinary person’ with three degrees in education (special education), including a doctorate from BU).
I read the Globe article and wondered….
In addition to “national” operations like Parents Defending Education and Moms for Liberty there are new “parents” groups in the states–Awake Illinois, Families for Schools (VA), etc. ll are led by GOP operatives and well-funded. It’s hard to keep up. There is literally no end to the money.
Hi, Maurice.
Here’s an Erika Sanzi FLASHBACK, where the charter school that Ms. Sanzi backs, and where she worked at the time, was caught in a scathing scandal. Among other things this debacle highlights the problems when charter school operators hire a bunch of uncredentialed, inexperienced, unprofessional, short-term (TFA among them) idiots for your school’s teaching staff, as the honchos running Blackstone Valley Prep apparently did. This got so much notorious press coverage that even the Daily Mail across the pond covered it HERE:
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3660186/Three-teachers-Blackstone-Valley-Prep-High-School-Rhode-Island-resign-shocking-private-chat-leak-shows-calling-students-idiots-losers.html
In a local op-ed, Erika had to do damage control, and attempt unsuccessfully (imo) to spin this to the charter school’s favor HERE:
https://www.providencejournal.com/story/opinion/2016/06/28/erika-sanzi-when-teachers-disparage-their-students/27587877007/
Ms. Sanzi believes that she can put a period to this scandal simply by saying, “Hey, we fired all those bad, bad, bad teachers, so the story’s over. Just move along. Nothing more to see here.” (NOTE: This was only exposed due to some anonymous whistle-blower hacking and leaking that hack to the press. But for this, those teachers would have remained and continued the damage they were doing with the rest of the world none-the-wiser.)
The problem, Erika, is that your op-ed rings hollow, as you oppose efforts, legislation, and a school code that WOULD HAVE PREVENTED THIS FIASCO IN THE FIRST PLACE. Those efforts might demand that charter schools maintain a hiring standard, such as requiring teachers credential, or be in the process of earning a credential, or CONVERSELY, not hiring people who are not dedicated to teaching as a career, and who view teaching as short stop-over to a different career, and merely use their short stint as a resume-building … or God forbid … use their measly two-years at an unregulated charter school as launching pad to start another charter school who likewise hire idiots.
Charter school operators want to cheap out wherever and whenever they can, starting with the teachers they hire. You pay minimum, you get minimum, or the idiots who were exposed in the above expose.